GEO for law firms (generative engine optimization) is the work of getting your firm named when someone asks ChatGPT, Gemini or Google’s AI for a lawyer. The honest version: a marketing agency can open doors for AI to consider you, but your reputation decides whether AI picks you.
You’ll hear three names for the same work: GEO, AEO (answer engine optimization) and AI SEO, the plain-English label. Google calls AEO and GEO terms for work “specifically focused on improving visibility in AI search experiences” (Google).
This page starts with what we can and can’t promise. Then it shows the exact directory pages we get clients listed on, from our own audits.
Key Takeaways
- In our audits (October 2026), about 85% of the sources AI cited came from fewer than 10 directories.
- The cited pages were those directories’ city and practice-area pages (for example, criminal defense lawyers in Las Vegas), not just lawyer profiles (our audits, October 2026).
- Google says optimizing for its AI features “is optimizing for the search experience, and thus still SEO,” and no special schema or llms.txt file is needed (Google).
- Reputation built over years counts. A 2026 study found ChatGPT wrote a brand into its searches 67% of the time when the brand was already in its prior knowledge, versus 11% otherwise (arXiv).
- Bar rules still apply: no fake reviews (FTC), no unverifiable “best” claims (ABA Rule 7.1) and no client details without consent (ABA Rule 1.6).
On this page: What to expect · Two kinds of firms · How AI picks · The audit · Directories · The shortlist · Jumping the line · Ethics · SEO · FAQ · Sources
Set expectations first: GEO opens doors, it doesn’t guarantee results
The first thing I tell a firm that asks about AI marketing is what it can’t buy: a promised spot in ChatGPT’s answer. Nobody can promise that, and anyone who does is guessing.
What we’ve seen in about half a year of client work:
- Google’s AI usually moves first. Gains tend to show in Google AI Overviews, AI Mode and Gemini before ChatGPT (our experience, 2026).
- ChatGPT can lag. It leans partly on what its model already knows (arXiv), so a new listing can take longer to change its answer.
- Results move around. One 2026 study found the sources AI tools cited overlapped only 34% to 42% from one day to the next (arXiv). One screenshot proves little.
- It’s less predictable than SEO. And SEO itself can take a long time in competitive practice areas.
Our take: GEO is a service for firms that already have a steady case pipeline and can spend on it without needing a fast return. If you need cases this quarter, ads or SEO will usually get you there faster.
Two firms we work with show what AI actually rewards
Our read: marketing opens more doors, but when AI looks behind each door, the lawyer with the longer, more proven record wins. Two of our clients show it.
The first is a lawyer with about 30 years of trials who has held public office. He never did SEO or any AI marketing, and Forbes picked him up on its own. He ranks first and second on ChatGPT for many of the searches we check (our audits, 2026). We think AI found his track record because it was already all over the web.
The second kind of firm did everything a marketing agency can do: links, content, directory listings. We did that work too, and it raised how often AI cited them. One firm is now often mentioned in Gemini and shows up in Google’s AI Overviews among the top criminal lawyers in its market. ChatGPT barely moved (our audits, 2026).
Another firm site we track shows the same split. Our monthly reports for June to August 2026 counted 88 to 116 AI Overview citations a month, 5 to 6 in Gemini and none in ChatGPT (our data).
Why AI recommends what is hard to fake
As we see it, search engines run on rules, and rules can be gamed. AI tools also follow rules, but what they reward is hard for an agency to speed up: years of cases, real reviews and outside recognition.
A 2026 study points the same way: ChatGPT wrote a brand into its web searches 67% of the time when that brand was already in its prior knowledge for the question, versus 11% otherwise (arXiv). The authors note their tests used the API, which may behave differently from the ChatGPT app.
Google’s local ranking help points to reputation too: “More reviews and positive ratings can help your business’s local ranking,” and prominence comes partly from how many websites link to you (Google). Branded mentions also matter. Ahrefs found web mentions of a brand correlated with AI visibility at 0.66 to 0.71 across 75,000 brands, and warned that correlation isn’t causation (Ahrefs).
Our take: an agency can improve the evidence AI finds about you. It can’t buy the recommendation. And fewer people read the articles now; they let AI read and summarize for them. Bain found about 80% of consumers rely on “zero-click” results in at least 40% of their searches (Bain).
Step 1: audit what AI tells your future clients
Every engagement starts with an audit. We pose as a potential client in your city and practice area, ask the AI tools who they recommend, and open every source they cite.
- Ask like a client. Try “top criminal defense lawyer in Las Vegas,” “who should I hire for a DUI in Henderson” or, for family law, “divorce lawyer in Las Vegas.” Run each in ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Perplexity.
- Open the sources. ChatGPT and the others show the pages they read. Click each one.
- Build a checklist. List every site, mark if you’re on it, and note which competitors are.
- Repeat it. Answers change between runs, so check the same questions on a schedule.
Track the results too. Search Console’s Generative AI performance report shows your impressions in AI Overviews and AI Mode (Google). Most ChatGPT links in our October 2026 test carried utm_source=chatgpt.com, so those visits show up in Analytics (our data).
Two things we’ve learned (our experience): a mention counts even without a backlink, though a backlink still helps your regular SEO. And where you appear in a directory’s list doesn’t seem to matter to AI, though it may to a person reading it.
Step 2: get listed on the directory pages AI reads
In our audits (October 2026), about 85% of the sources AI cited came from fewer than 10 directories. When we asked AI for a top criminal defense lawyer in Las Vegas, it went to each directory’s Las Vegas criminal defense page (think /las-vegas/criminal-defense/). Those city and practice-area pages mattered most, so those are the pages we got clients onto.
A profile on the directory builds the foundation. The city list is the target.
Avvo, FindLaw, Super Lawyers, Expertise and Forbes come up most in our audits, and an agency study adds Justia. The citation counts come from that agency’s September 2026 study of 320 lawyer-hiring questions run on ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews (We Do Web). The “how to get listed” column is each directory’s own process as of the date we checked it, October 21, 2026:
| Directory | Citations in that study | How to get listed (as checked 2026-10-21) | Difficulty (our experience) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super Lawyers | 423 | Peer nominations plus independent research; lawyers can’t nominate themselves; selections are annual and cover 5% of a state’s lawyers (Super Lawyers) | Hard; earned over time |
| Avvo | 358 | Find and claim your free profile (Avvo) | Moderate |
| Justia | 320 | Claim and complete a free profile (Justia) | Moderate |
| Expertise.com | 276 | Picks most lists through its own research (Expertise.com); legal professionals can also request a review (Expertise.com). In our experience the review runs yearly, so if you miss it, plan for next year | Hard; plan ahead |
| FindLaw | 115 | Add your profile in FindLaw’s Profile Update tool; FindLaw staff review and publish it within two business days (FindLaw) | Moderate |
| Forbes Advisor | 61 (Forbes overall) | Its team researches and scores lawyers from public data such as state bar and court records; we found no application process (Forbes Advisor). In our experience it usually takes a PR firm or a real connection | Hardest |
For the city and practice-area lists that take requests, our team applied with a dossier explaining why the lawyer deserved a spot: years in practice, trial and case experience, review count and rating, and recognition. The listing followed. In our experience, firms that meet the bar get added within a couple of months. Super Lawyers and Forbes Advisor don’t take applications, so a dossier won’t get you onto those.
In our audits, AI also used the organic listings on these pages, not entries marked sponsored or advertisement, and ChatGPT says it doesn’t consider listings marked that way. No published study has confirmed this. One agency documented ChatGPT drawing on an Expertise city page that carried a “Featured Provider” label and an advertising disclaimer (Custom Legal Marketing). Our take: earn the organic spot and don’t count on a paid one.
Not sure which lists your market’s AI answers use? Our Law Firm Growth Evaluation starts with that audit.
Step 3: be the best option once you’re on the shortlist
Getting listed puts you in the pool. Being picked takes looking like the best of the lawyers AI is comparing. So ask yourself: if someone looked at me and four competitors, what would make me the clear choice, and have I shown it?
We also ask the AI directly, “What do you look for when choosing a criminal defense lawyer?” Its answer gives you a to-do list. These are the four we work on with clients:
- Reviews. Set a goal to be in the top three in your market for five-star Google reviews. Ask every client the same way. Our guide to compliant Google reviews covers the rules.
- Case experience. You can’t change your years in practice. You can take more cases and add the big, complex ones to your record.
- Press. When a case is newsworthy, have your PR or marketing team put out a release, with the client’s consent.
- A strong bio. We always write a detailed biography for each lawyer and the firm. Once you’re on the shortlist, AI reads your bio, and so do potential clients. It’s the one place you control what they see.
Jumping the line takes something people talk about
Thirty years of trials is one way to become the obvious answer. If you want to get there sooner, you have to become the lawyer people in your area talk about: the go-to voice on DUI cases, the firm with a big local following, the one who did something nobody else did.
I picked up this idea from the Build in Public SEO channel, and two episodes show it working.
- Genuine buzz beats bigger brands. In one episode, the guest explains why Fenty Beauty beat Dior in Google’s AI for “best lip gloss.” Fenty had close to 53,000 Google Shopping reviews; the next brand had about 1,400. It was also the top pick in a New York Times review. Fenty ran press releases around its “one sold every 10 seconds” stat, and ChatGPT quotes it (Build in Public).
- Events are back. In another, GaryVee says he’s “very bullish” on event and experiential marketing, which he sees as the other end of a “barbell” from AI and digital (Build in Public).
Our take: for a lawyer, that could be hosting a free community clinic, speaking at local events or building a real social following. It’s hard when your week is full of trials, but once you hit a plateau, it’s how you get past it.
What not to do: the bar rules still apply
In our view, anything that tricks AI today will likely be patched within weeks or months, because AI keeps getting better at spotting it. Some tricks also break the rules you practice under. Have counsel check your state’s rules before you publish anything new.
| Don’t | Why | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Call yourself “the best” | Rule 7.1 bars misleading claims. New York calls advertising yourself as “the Best” improper, though a Best Lawyers listing chosen by a defensible process may be advertised | ABA Rule 7.1 comment, NYSBA Opinion 1007 |
| Imply past results will repeat | True case results can still mislead if they suggest the same outcome for the reader. Florida flags past results that are not objectively verifiable | ABA Rule 7.1 comment, Florida Bar checklist |
| Cite awards or “best” lists with no objective criteria | Florida flags recognition from groups without objective criteria, and North Carolina says a “best” directory needs objective, verifiable standards | Florida Bar checklist, NC State Bar 2018 FEO 1 |
| Pay anyone to recommend you | Rule 7.2 bars giving anything of value for a recommendation, with narrow exceptions such as paying the reasonable costs of permitted advertising | ABA Rule 7.2 |
| Publicize a client’s case without consent | Rule 1.6 bars revealing information about a representation without informed consent | ABA Rule 1.6 |
| Post, encourage or buy fake reviews | North Carolina: “Under no circumstances” may a lawyer help post fake or misleading reviews, and the FTC’s 2024 rule bans buying or selling them | NC State Bar 2018 FEO 1, FTC |
You also don’t need special tricks. Google Search ignores llms.txt files, Google says, and “there’s no special schema.org markup you need to add” for its AI features (Google).
SEO is still the foundation
If you already do SEO, you’re ahead. Google says its AI features are “rooted in our core Search ranking and quality systems,” and a page must be indexed and eligible for a snippet to be linked in them (Google).
In our experience, traditional SEO and GEO share the same best practices: a fast site, easy navigation, a sitemap, and the same firm name, address and phone number everywhere. Our law firm SEO strategy guide and local SEO checklist cover them.
Getting cited works differently in each tool, though. In our test of 12 legal questions on October 21, 2026, Google’s AI Overviews cited a law firm’s site in all 12 answers, while ChatGPT did in 2. Super Lawyers was cited by three of the four tools we checked (our data). Our take: that’s why the directory work matters most for ChatGPT.
Is GEO a fit for your firm?
Our take: GEO gives the hard-working lawyer a fair shot. For years, that lawyer lost online to firms with bigger SEO budgets. AI looks for real track records, reviews and recognition instead. It still doesn’t hurt to set up the foundation: core directory profiles, a solid website and good SEO habits.
We’ll audit what AI says in your market, show you which listings you need, and tell you honestly whether it’s a fit. If you mainly need more cases soon, we’ll tell you if SEO or ads would grow them faster. Start with a Law Firm Growth Evaluation, or see how our GEO service works.
Frequently asked questions about GEO for law firms
What is GEO for law firms?
Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the work of getting your firm named and cited in AI answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google’s AI. It overlaps heavily with SEO, plus a focus on the directory pages and reviews AI reads.
Can I pay to be recommended by ChatGPT?
No. ChatGPT ads are separate, labeled placements, and OpenAI says “Ads do not influence ChatGPT’s answers” (OpenAI). We tested ChatGPT ads with real budget; what advertising on ChatGPT got us has the numbers.
How long does GEO take?
No AI company publishes a timeline. Google says that after you change a page, crawling can take “anywhere from several days to several months” (Google). In our experience, directory listings land within a few months, Google’s AI responds first and ChatGPT can take longer.
Does GEO replace SEO?
No. Google says optimizing for its AI features is still SEO (Google). We treat GEO as a layer on top of good SEO, not a replacement.
Do reviews matter for AI search?
We think so, but the evidence is indirect. Google says more reviews and positive ratings can help local ranking (Google), and its AI features are rooted in its core Search systems (Google). Earn reviews honestly.
Sources
- Google Search Central, “Google’s Guide to Optimizing for Generative AI Features on Google Search,” https://developers.google.com/search/docs/fundamentals/ai-optimization-guide, checked 2026-10-21.
- Google Search Central, “AI Features and Your Website,” https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features, checked 2026-10-21.
- arXiv, Mahe Chen and Nick Koudas, “What Drives AI Citations? Content, Retrieval and Model Knowledge in Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)” (October 2026), https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15033, checked 2026-10-21.
- arXiv, Schulte and others, “Don’t Measure Once: Measuring Visibility in AI Search (GEO)” (April 2026), https://arxiv.org/html/2604.07585v1, checked 2026-10-21.
- Google Business Profile Help, “Tips to improve your local ranking on Google,” https://support.google.com/business/answer/7091?hl=en, checked 2026-10-21.
- Ahrefs, “Top Brand Visibility Factors in ChatGPT, AI Mode, and AI Overviews (75k Brands Studied)” (December 12, 2025), https://ahrefs.com/blog/ai-brand-visibility-correlations/, checked 2026-10-21.
- Bain & Company, “Goodbye Clicks, Hello AI: Zero-Click Search Redefines Marketing” (February 19, 2025), https://www.bain.com/insights/goodbye-clicks-hello-ai-zero-click-search-redefines-marketing/, checked 2026-10-21.
- We Do Web, “Study: 3 Legal Directories Get the Most AI Search Visibility” (October 5, 2026), https://www.wedoweb.com/blog/legal-directories-with-most-ai-search-visibility/, checked 2026-10-21.
- Super Lawyers, “Selection Process,” https://www.superlawyers.com/about/selection-process/, checked 2026-10-21.
- Avvo, “Find and claim your free Avvo Profile,” https://www.avvo.com/for-lawyers/avvo-profile, checked 2026-10-21.
- Justia, “Free, Professional Profiles for Lawyers,” https://lawyers.justia.com/lawyer-directory-listings, checked 2026-10-21.
- Expertise.com, “Our Selection Process,” https://www.expertise.com/about/our-selection-process, checked 2026-10-21.
- Expertise.com, “Get Reviewed by Expertise.com,” https://www.expertise.com/review-me, checked 2026-10-21.
- FindLaw Profile Update Help, “Creating a Profile for an Attorney,” https://profileupdate.findlaw.com/help/creating-a-profile-for-an-attorney/, checked 2026-10-21.
- Forbes Advisor, “How Forbes Advisor Rates Lawyers And Legal Services,” https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/reviews-methodology/, checked 2026-10-21.
- Custom Legal Marketing, “Paid Directory Listings Can Turn Into Organic ChatGPT Recommendations” (October 1, 2026), https://custom.legal/paid-directory-listings-can-turn-into-organic-chatgpt-recommendations/, checked 2026-10-21.
- Build in Public (YouTube), “Why Rihanna’s Fenty Beats Dior in AI Search (And What You Can Copy)” (October 16, 2026), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvM93XlSCK4, checked 2026-10-21.
- Build in Public (YouTube), GaryVee interview on Gemini and AI search (July 8, 2026), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUnV-xaH32k, checked 2026-10-21.
- American Bar Association, “Comment on Rule 7.1,” https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_7_1_communication_concerning_a_lawyer_s_services/comment_on_rule_7_1/, checked 2026-10-21.
- American Bar Association, “Rule 7.2: Communications Concerning a Lawyer’s Services: Specific Rules,” https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_7_2_advertising/, checked 2026-10-21.
- American Bar Association, “Rule 1.6: Confidentiality of Information,” https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_1_6_confidentiality_of_information/, checked 2026-10-21.
- North Carolina State Bar, “2018 Formal Ethics Opinion 1: Participation in Website Directories and Rating Systems that include Third Party Reviews” (July 27, 2018), https://www.ncbar.gov/for-lawyers/ethics-and-governing-rules/ethics-opinions/opinions/2018-formal-ethics-opinion-1/, checked 2026-10-21.
- New York State Bar Association, “Ethics Opinion 1007” (April 3, 2014), https://nysba.org/ethics-opinion-1007/, checked 2026-10-21.
- The Florida Bar, “Quick Reference Checklist: Lawyer or Law Firm Websites, Social Media Pages, and Video Sharing Channels,” https://www.floridabar.org/ethics/etad/checklist-websites-sm-video-sharing/, checked 2026-10-21.
- Federal Trade Commission, “Federal Trade Commission Announces Final Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials” (August 14, 2024), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2024/08/federal-trade-commission-announces-final-rule-banning-fake-reviews-testimonials, checked 2026-10-21.
- OpenAI Help Center, “Ads in ChatGPT,” https://help.openai.com/en/articles/20001047-ads-in-chatgpt, checked 2026-10-21.
- Search Console Help, “Generative AI performance report (Search),” https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/16984139?hl=en, checked 2026-10-21.
Images: AI-generated.
See what turns your marketing
into signed cases.
Your firm doesn't need more random marketing. It needs a growth system that shows what turns into signed cases.